Chemical Camouflage
A study published
by Whitehead et al. (2014) discusses the ant-plant mutualism that occurs within
some ecosystems. The plant provides ants with shelter and/or food, while the
ants offer protection to the plant from other herbivores. Ants are extremely
good at defensive mechanisms, protecting the plant against most herbivore
attacks (Whitehead et al., 2014). Yet sometimes there are animals that can
sneak past the ant defence system without the colony knowing. These organisms
benefit greatly from flying under the radar as they have access to competition free
food that is usually readily available for the ants (Whitehead et al., 2014).
So how do they go undetected while essentially eating dinner at the same “restaurant”?
Some examples of these defences are having a
toughened exocuticle, shelter-building behaviours and behavioural avoidance maneuvres
(Whitehead et al., 2014). Yet the defence
mechanism we are talking about today is chemical camouflage. Ant societies are
known to use chemical cues to recognise individuals from the same colony and to
transfer complex information (Jackson & Ratnieks, 2006). To do this they
use cuticular hydrocarbons, which are also used for protection by the ant (Otte,
Hilker & Geiselhardt, 2018). An organism using chemical camouflage can
circumnavigate through a colony of ants without being detected by copying the
ants cuticular hydrocarbon profile (Otte, Hilker & Geiselhardt, 2018). This
means that the organism benefits from the plants or ant colony without being
involved in the mutual relationship (Whitehead et al., 2014).
An example
of an animal using chemical camouflage against ants is the genus of leaf-footed
bugs (Piezogaster reclusus). They feed
on the plant Neotropical bull-horn acacias (Vachellia
collinsii), who have a mutual relationship with the ants (Pseudomyrmex spinicola; Whitehead et
al., 2014). The ants feed on the acacia’s floral nectaries and Beltian bodies,
which are multicellular structures that contains large amounts of proteins and
lipids, that the ants feed to their larvae (Rickson, 1975). The Piezogaster reclusus are sap-feeding insects,
with a primary diet of sap from the young leaves of the acacias (Whitehead et
al., 2014). The leaves wilt causing damage to the floral nectaries and Beltian
bodies, this is costly for both the ants and the plants.
![]() |
Piezogaster reclusus |
Interestingly,
Whitehead et al. found that when Piezogaster
reclusus is transferred from one acacia tree with an ant colony, to a different
area the Piezogaster reclusus no
longer has an efficient defence mechanism. Which Whitehead et al. hypothesise that
the chemical camouflage is colony specific.
There are many more examples of chemical camouflage being used in the environment (including diet induced!) but unfortunately we don't have time for them in this post.
References:
Brooker
R., Munday P., Chivers D., & Jones G. (2015). You Are What You Eat:
Diet-Induced Chemical Crypsis in a Coral-Feeding Reef Fish. Proceedings
of the Royal Society of London B.
Rickson F. (1975). The
Ultrastructure of Acacia cornigera L. Beltian Body Tissue. American Journal of Botany. 62(9), 913-922.
Jackson
D., & Ratnieks F. (2006). Communication in Ants. Current Biology. 16(15). 570-574.
Otte T.,
Hilker M., & Geiselhardt S. (2018). Phenotypic Plasticity of Cuticular
Hydrocarbon Profiles in Insects. Journal
of Chemical Ecology. 44(3), 235-247.
Whitehead
S., Reid E., Sapp J., Poveda K., Royer A., Posto A., & Kessler A. (2014). A
Specialist Herbivore Uses Chemical Camouflage to Overcome the Defenses of an
Ant-Plant Mutualism. PLOS ONE. 9(7), 2-9.
Very interesting. Is there any indication of the underlying mechanism that allows these animals to copy the cuticular hydrocarbon compounds so effectively?
ReplyDelete